Article V Blueprint
Article V BlueprintA More Perfect Union

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION — NOT LAW. This is a working draft of a proposed roadmap — a blueprint for how, together, we might accomplish what it describes. It is based on the proposed Revised Constitution presented here, a living document that will keep being revised and improved before anything is adopted. Nothing in it is enacted, and no provision binds any person, legislature, or court. When we say blueprint, we mean exactly that: a starting point offered for the work ahead — nothing more. We get there together.

Constitutional Transition and Legal Conformity Act

A Resolution of the 120th Congress Identifying Federal Laws Requiring Repeal, Amendment, or Replacement Upon Ratification of the Revised Constitution of the United States
Prepared for Introduction — 120th Congress  |  Prior to Constitutional Ratification

What this document is — and isn't
This document does not itself repeal or amend any law. It is a congressional resolution of identification — a pre-ratification inventory of every federal statute that conflicts with, is superseded by, or requires amendment to conform with the Revised Constitution of the United States. It establishes the legislative agenda Congress must complete upon ratification, organized by urgency. Each entry identifies the law, its current US Code citation, its current status, the constitutional provision it conflicts with, and the action required. Full implementing legislation for each item shall be introduced and brought to a vote within the timeframes specified in this resolution.
Important — what takes effect the moment it's ratified
Important: Upon ratification of the Revised Constitution, all laws identified in Category One of this resolution are immediately and automatically unconstitutional by operation of Article Six of the Revised Constitution, which makes the Constitution the supreme law of the land. Congress must act within the deadlines specified below. For laws in Categories Two, Three, and Four, Congress has the discretion to act in the order and on the timeline specified, but may not unreasonably delay conforming legislation beyond the deadlines in this resolution.
Portrait source: Attributed to Ellen Sharples, Richard Dobbs Spaight (c. 1800–1810). National Park Service via Wikimedia Commons. Source

Whereas the people of the United States, exercising the sovereign authority acknowledged in Article Seven of the Revised Constitution — an authority that predates and is not constrained by any prior constitutional framework — have adopted a new fundamental law through direct popular ratification; and whereas the Revised Constitution, upon ratification, becomes the supreme law of the land and automatically supersedes any inconsistent federal statute by operation of Article Six; and whereas Congress has an affirmative constitutional obligation to bring federal law into conformity with the Constitution it has sworn to uphold; now therefore, the Congress of the United States hereby identifies the following federal laws as requiring legislative action, and commits to taking that action within the timeframes specified below.

Pre-Ratification Sovereignty Resolution. Prior to or concurrent with the ratification process, Congress shall adopt a formal joint resolution affirming the constitutional basis for the ratification of the Revised Constitution. That resolution shall state: that the authority of the Revised Constitution derives from the sovereign authority of the people, which is prior to and not constrained by the amendment procedures of any prior constitutional framework; that the Founders exercised this same authority in 1787 when they replaced the Articles of Confederation without following that document's amendment procedure; that direct popular ratification by referendum in 38 states constitutes the most democratically legitimate form of constitutional adoption ever employed in American history; and that Congress affirms its obligation to implement the Revised Constitution in good faith and to resist any effort to challenge its legitimacy through procedural rather than substantive argument. This resolution is not itself law — it is a statement of congressional intent and constitutional interpretation that will be entered into the record of any subsequent judicial proceeding challenging the ratification's validity.

Legislative Timeline Upon Ratification

Day 1 — Ratification Category One laws become immediately unconstitutional. No further enforcement is lawful. Existing death sentences automatically convert to life imprisonment. Marijuana federal scheduling automatically removed. Debt ceiling mechanism automatically void.
Days 1–180 Congress must pass the Category One Repeal Act — formally removing all Category One statutes from the US Code. Within 180 days, DOJ must complete automatic expungement of all federal simple marijuana possession convictions.
Days 1–365 Congress must pass implementing legislation for: the new public campaign finance system; the revised Congressional Review Act framework; the conduct-based voting rights preclearance system; and the OBBBA healthcare cuts repeal.
Years 1–2 Congress must amend: FLSA for regional minimum wage floors and double time; NLRA for organizing rights and permanent striker replacement ban; HAVA for free government ID; Dodd-Frank for CFPB cause-only removal; Fair Housing Act for LGBTQ+ and status protections; Social Security Act for Trust Fund ring-fencing.
Years 2–3 Congress must pass all implementing statutes for new constitutional programs: National Healthcare Cost Board; Environmental Burden Registry; National Housing Infrastructure Program; Universal Broadband Service Program; Teacher Pay Floor; Universal Childcare subsidy system; Portable Education Accounts.
By Year 4 — Two Election Cycles Ranked-choice voting must be fully operational for all federal general elections as required by Article Eleven, Section 4. Congress must pass the Federal Elections Tabulation Standards Act establishing uniform ranked-choice counting procedures, certification standards, and providing federally funded tabulation software and implementation support to every state. This deadline is tied to election cycles, not calendar years — operational by the second federal general election following ratification.
Ongoing Congress must maintain annual appropriations for all constitutionally mandated programs at levels adequate to their constitutional function, and may not use the appropriations process to eliminate or gut any constitutionally required program.

Category One
Must Be Repealed — Directly Unconstitutional Upon Ratification
These laws are immediately and automatically void upon ratification of the Revised Constitution. No act of Congress is required to make them unenforceable — they are unconstitutional from the moment the 38th state ratifies. However, Congress must formally repeal them to remove them from the US Code and prevent confusion. The Category One Repeal Act should be drafted, debated, and ready for immediate passage on or before ratification day.
Repeal Immediately
1. Controlled Substances Act — Marijuana Scheduling Provisions
21 U.S.C. §801 et seq. (Controlled Substances Act, 1970) — Sections placing marijuana in Schedule I

Current status: Marijuana is classified as a Schedule I controlled substance under the CSA — the most restrictive category, reserved for substances with no accepted medical use and high abuse potential. Congress placed it there in 1970. A December 2025 executive order directed the Attorney General to expedite rescheduling to Schedule III, but as of ratification no final agency action has been taken. 24 states and DC have legalized recreational marijuana under state law; all remain technically in violation of the CSA. Federal prosecution of state-legal marijuana activity has been partially limited by annual Rohrabacher-Farr appropriations riders, which must be renewed each fiscal year and could lapse at any time.

The conflict: Article Seventeen, Section 2 of the Revised Constitution removes marijuana from federal controlled substances schedules entirely upon ratification. Marijuana scheduling in Schedule I is directly and immediately unconstitutional from the moment of ratification.

Related provisions requiring simultaneous repeal:

  • Internal Revenue Code §280E — denies federal tax deductions to businesses "trafficking" in marijuana; immediately unconstitutional since marijuana trafficking is no longer a federal crime
  • 18 U.S.C. §611 — prohibits noncitizen voting; must be amended (not fully repealed) to carve out qualifying LPRs under Article One Section 2 of the Revised Constitution
  • All annual Rohrabacher-Farr appropriations riders — superseded and no longer needed; marijuana enforcement is itself unconstitutional
Constitutional authority: Article Seventeen, Section 2 — Federal Marijuana Prohibition Ended; Automatic Expungement
Action Required Repeal 21 U.S.C. §§801 et seq. (marijuana scheduling provisions only — leave other CSA schedules intact). Repeal IRC §280E. Amend 18 U.S.C. §611 to carve out qualifying LPRs. Direct DOJ to complete automatic expungement of all federal simple possession convictions within 180 days. Establish DOJ administrative process for expungement certification and record clearing. Congress retains authority to regulate marijuana commerce — age requirements, labeling, quality standards, and interstate commerce rules — and must pass a federal marijuana commerce regulatory framework within one year of ratification.
Repeal Immediately
2. Federal Death Penalty Statutes
18 U.S.C. §3591 et seq. (Federal Death Penalty Act); 21 U.S.C. §848(e); 18 U.S.C. §1111, §1201, §2113, and all other federal statutes authorizing capital punishment

Current status: The federal death penalty is authorized by multiple statutes covering crimes including murder of federal officials, terrorism, espionage, and drug trafficking resulting in death. The Biden administration imposed a moratorium in January 2021; the Trump administration resumed executions in January 2025. As of ratification, approximately 40 people are on federal death row.

The conflict: Article Seventeen, Section 3 of the Revised Constitution abolishes the federal death penalty. Life without parole is the federal maximum sentence. Any federal statute authorizing execution is immediately unconstitutional upon ratification.

Constitutional authority: Article Seventeen, Section 3 — Abolition of the Federal Death Penalty
Action Required Repeal all federal capital punishment statutes. Within 180 days of ratification, the Bureau of Prisons must convert all existing federal death sentences to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole by operation of the Revised Constitution — no individual resentencing hearings are required, as the conversion is automatic and constitutional. Congress must amend all relevant sentencing statutes to replace "death" with "life imprisonment without the possibility of parole" as the maximum federal penalty.
Repeal Immediately
3. Federal Statutory Debt Ceiling
31 U.S.C. §3101 et seq. (Public Debt Limit)

Current status: The federal debt ceiling is a statutory limit on the total amount the federal government may borrow. It was reinstated at $36.1 trillion in January 2025, then suspended again by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 through January 2029. The debt ceiling has been raised or suspended 102 times since 1940. It has been used as a political weapon repeatedly, bringing the country to the brink of default in 2011, 2013, 2021, and 2023.

The conflict: Article Three, Section 6 of the Revised Constitution abolishes the debt ceiling mechanism entirely. When Congress authorizes spending that requires borrowing, the authority to borrow is automatically granted. Any statute imposing a separate borrowing limit on obligations Congress has already authorized is unconstitutional.

Constitutional authority: Article Three, Section 6 — Debt Ceiling Abolished; Automatic Borrowing Authority; Automatic Borrowing Authority
Action Required Repeal 31 U.S.C. §3101 et seq. Congress must pass a Treasury Borrowing Authorization Act implementing the automatic borrowing mechanism — directing the Department of the Treasury to issue debt as necessary to meet all obligations authorized by Congress, without limit, subject only to the Revised Constitution's supermajority requirement for budgets that push debt above 100% of GDP. All existing debt ceiling suspension clauses in prior appropriations acts are automatically void.
Replace with New System
4. Federal Election Campaign Act — Private Financing System
52 U.S.C. §30101 et seq. (Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended); Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain-Feingold) provisions; FEC regulations at 11 C.F.R.

Current status: FECA is the primary federal campaign finance statute — establishing private contribution limits, disclosure requirements, and the Federal Election Commission as the enforcement agency. Citizens United v. FEC (2010) struck down limits on corporate and union independent spending. McCutcheon v. FEC (2014) eliminated aggregate contribution limits. Individual contribution limits are $3,500 per candidate per election for the 2026 cycle. Total spending in the 2024 election cycle exceeded $16 billion.

The conflict: Article Eight of the Revised Constitution replaces private campaign financing entirely with a state-administered public financing system. No candidate for federal office may accept any private donation. The FEC's role is replaced by the Office of Public Campaign Finance. Citizens United and McCutcheon are superseded by constitutional amendment, not case law.

Constitutional authority: Article Eight, Sections 2–7 — Campaign Finance System
Action Required Repeal FECA and all implementing FEC regulations. Dissolve the Federal Election Commission. Enact the Public Campaign Finance Implementation Act, which must: establish the Office of Public Campaign Finance and Director appointment process; direct states to establish and administer public campaign account systems; set the account funding formula, staff compensation limits, and advertising spending cap parameters; establish real-time public disclosure infrastructure; define the $25,000 individual independent expenditure right and 48-hour disclosure mechanism; create criminal penalties for organizational spending violations; and establish the Director's three-election-cycle term and judicial removal process.

Repeal Immediately
5. Insurrection Act — Domestic Deployment of the Armed Forces
10 U.S.C. §§251–255 (Insurrection Act of 1807, as amended)

Current status: The Insurrection Act lets the President deploy federal troops and federalize the National Guard against civilians inside the United States, largely at sole discretion, with no fixed time limit and minimal judicial review — the primary statutory vehicle for turning regular military force inward.

The conflict: Article Twenty-Five, Section 1 prohibits the use of the armed forces against the American people. The Act’s domestic-deployment provisions are directly and immediately unconstitutional upon ratification and are void without further action.

Constitutional authority: Article Twenty-Five, Section 1 — The Prohibition on Domestic Military Force. Coupled action: legitimate National Guard and civil-support roles are preserved by the new Militia, National Guard, and Anti-Paramilitary Act (Category Four), so this repeal leaves no gap in lawful disaster or emergency response.
Category Two
Must Be Repealed or Replaced — Directly Superseded Within One Year
These laws are not immediately void upon ratification — they don't directly prohibit something the Constitution mandates, or their unconstitutionality requires a specific triggering event (such as appropriations lapsing). However, they are substantively superseded by the Revised Constitution and must be replaced with conforming legislation within one year of ratification.
Repeal and Replace
6. One Big Beautiful Bill Act — Healthcare Provisions
Public Law 119-21 (signed July 4, 2025) — Medicaid, ACA, and Medicare provisions

Current status: The OBBBA cut over $1 trillion from federal healthcare programs through 2034. Key provisions: Medicaid work requirements (80 hours/month) for expansion adults, effective January 2027; ACA enhanced premium tax credits allowed to expire end of 2025; DACA recipients made ineligible for ACA marketplace coverage; certain lawfully present immigrants restricted from Medicare and Medicaid; more frequent Medicaid eligibility redeterminations every 6 months for expansion adults; expansion of orphan drug carve-outs limiting Medicare drug price negotiation. The Congressional Budget Office estimates 11.8 million people will lose health coverage by 2034 from the healthcare provisions alone; the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimates up to 15 million.

The conflict: Article Eight, Right 37 of the Revised Constitution establishes healthcare as a constitutional right. Article Eleven establishes the Essential Care system and prohibits Congress from using the appropriations process to eliminate it or reduce it below the level necessary to provide genuine essential medical care to all citizens and qualifying residents. The OBBBA's healthcare cuts are unconstitutional under this framework — they use the appropriations and eligibility process to effectively eliminate meaningful healthcare access for millions of people protected by the Revised Constitution.

Constitutional authority: Right 37 — The Right to Healthcare; Article Eleven — Essential Care System
Action Required Enact the Essential Care Restoration Act, which must: repeal the OBBBA's Medicaid work requirements; restore ACA enhanced premium tax credits; restore Medicaid and ACA eligibility for DACA recipients and lawfully present immigrants; restore annual Medicaid eligibility redetermination timelines; restore full Medicare drug price negotiation scope; and appropriate sufficient funds to maintain Essential Care coverage for all persons constitutionally entitled to it. CS-3 (Essential Care System Implementation Act) is enacted, establishing the National Healthcare Cost Board, six-year automatic overhead cap phase-in (25%→15%), three-tier prior authorization framework, seven-year new drug premium, State-Federal Public Benefit Corporation public option, dental/vision/hearing basket, Medicare buy-in at age 60, and Strategic Essential Medicines Reserve. CS-3 explicitly includes reproductive healthcare services — abortion services, contraception, fertility treatment, and pregnancy-related care — in the Essential Care basket from Day One. The Essential Care Restoration Act remains required to repeal the OBBCA's Medicaid work requirements and restore ACA enhanced premium tax credits; CS-3 implements the constitutional architecture but does not itself repeal prior conflicting statutes.
Replace with Reformed Version
7. Congressional Review Act
5 U.S.C. §801 et seq. (Congressional Review Act of 1996)

Current status: The CRA allows Congress to overturn any final federal agency rule by passing a joint resolution of disapproval by simple majority in both chambers. A joint resolution requires presidential signature or veto override. The CRA includes a provision that once a rule is disapproved, no substantially similar rule may ever be issued without new legislation — a permanent ban on re-regulation. The CRA has been used 117 times; it was used extensively by the Trump administration in 2017 and 2025 to eliminate regulations issued in the final months of the Obama and Biden administrations.

The conflict: Article Three, Section 7 of the Revised Constitution preserves the congressional override mechanism but eliminates the permanent re-regulation ban, requires written specific objections identifying the exact provisions and reasons for disapproval, and prohibits use of the CRA to systematically dismantle constitutionally required regulatory programs under Article Eighteen or any other provision of the Revised Constitution.

Constitutional authority: Article Three, Section 7 — Congressional Review of Federal Agency Regulations of Federal Agency Regulations
Action Required Repeal the current CRA (5 U.S.C. §801 et seq.) and enact the Revised Congressional Review Act, which must: preserve the simple majority disapproval mechanism; require all joint resolutions of disapproval to include a written finding identifying with particularity the specific regulatory provisions objected to and the specific statutory basis for the objection; eliminate the permanent re-regulation ban — agencies may issue revised regulations after 180 days addressing stated objections; and include an explicit prohibition on using the CRA to eliminate any constitutionally required regulatory program in its entirety.
Replace with Conduct-Based System
8. Voting Rights Act — Sections 4 and 5 (Preclearance Framework)
52 U.S.C. §10303 (Section 4 — Coverage Formula); 52 U.S.C. §10304 (Section 5 — Preclearance)

Current status: Section 5 of the VRA historically required jurisdictions covered by Section 4's formula to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any voting law change. In Shelby County v. Holder (2013), the Supreme Court struck down Section 4(b)'s coverage formula as based on outdated data, leaving Section 5 unenforceable. No replacement formula has been enacted. Since Shelby County, at least 31 states have passed 103 or more restrictive voting laws. The John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, which would have replaced the coverage formula, passed the House in 2021 but died in the Senate. The remainder of the VRA — particularly Section 2's nationwide effects-based prohibition on discriminatory voting practices — remains in full force.

The conflict: Right 34 of the Revised Constitution establishes a conduct-based preclearance system that applies equally to every jurisdiction — any jurisdiction found by a federal court to have violated federal voting rights law enters 10 years of mandatory preclearance, regardless of its geographic location or historical record. This replaces the geographic coverage formula that the Supreme Court struck down.

Constitutional authority: Right 34 — The Right to Vote; conduct-based preclearance implemented in CS-15
Action Required Enact the Voting Rights Restoration Act, which must: repeal VRA Sections 4 and 5 as currently written; enact a new Section 4 establishing the conduct-based trigger — any jurisdiction with a final federal court finding of voting rights law violation enters 10 years of mandatory preclearance; enact a new Section 5 defining the preclearance submission process, the 60-day DOJ/DC District Court review period, the deemed-approved default, and the automatic exit mechanism after 10 consecutive violation-free years; and direct DOJ to establish the administrative infrastructure to receive and process preclearance submissions under the new framework. VRA Section 2 is preserved and requires no amendment.
Repeal Conflicting Provisions
9. STOCK Act — Disclosure Only vs. Full Prohibition
5 U.S.C. App. §101 et seq. (Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012)

Current status: The STOCK Act requires Members of Congress, their spouses, and senior staff to disclose stock trades over $1,000 within 45 days of the transaction. It explicitly clarifies that Members are subject to insider trading laws. It does not ban stock trading — it only requires disclosure. Penalties for non-disclosure are minimal: $200 per violation, rarely enforced. Multiple bills to ban congressional stock trading outright — the ETHICS Act, the Ban Congressional Stock Trading Act — have been introduced repeatedly but never passed.

The conflict: Article Three, Section 5 of the Revised Constitution bans all trading in stocks, commodities, and securities by Members of Congress, their spouses, dependents, and entities in which they hold a 5% or greater interest, during their time in office. Trading must be divested or placed in a blind trust within 90 days of taking office. Violation = removal and a permanent bar from federal office. The STOCK Act's disclosure-only framework is superseded by the constitutional prohibition.

Constitutional authority: Article Three, Section 5 — No Stock Trading or Financial Conflicts or Financial Conflicts
Action Required Amend the STOCK Act to: convert the disclosure requirement into a prohibition; establish the Office of Congressional Financial Compliance to administer the 90-day divestment and blind trust process; set civil and criminal penalties for prohibited trading; and establish the removal mechanism for violation. The disclosure infrastructure built under the STOCK Act should be preserved and repurposed for the constitutional prohibition's enforcement.

Repeal and Replace
10. FISA, the USA PATRIOT Act, and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act — Surveillance Authorities
50 U.S.C. §1801 et seq. (FISA); Pub. L. 107-56 (USA PATRIOT Act); 18 U.S.C. §2510 et seq. (ECPA); FISA Amendments Act §702

Current status: Current law permits broad electronic surveillance — including bulk collection and warrantless programs such as Section 702 — under standards well below a probable-cause warrant, with oversight concentrated in a secret court.

The conflict: Article Twelve and Rights 9 and 10 require individualized, warrant-based standards and protect digital communications and data. The existing authorities are superseded — but lawful surveillance must continue, so this is a replacement, not a bare repeal.

Constitutional authority: Article Twelve — Surveillance Framework; Rights 9 and 10. Framework-first: repeal takes effect only once the Federal Surveillance Standards and Privacy Act (CS-13) is operational, so no lawful investigative capability lapses into a vacuum.
Category Three
Must Be Amended — Good Laws That Need Upgrading Within Two Years
These laws are valid, functioning, and consistent with the principles of the Revised Constitution — but specific provisions must be amended to implement constitutional mandates, add new requirements, or remove provisions that are now inconsistent. They are not repealed; they are modernized.
Amend — Significant
11. Fair Labor Standards Act
29 U.S.C. §201 et seq. (Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended)

Current status: The FLSA establishes a federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour — unchanged since July 2009, the longest stretch without an increase in the law's history. Overtime is required at time-and-a-half for hours over 40 in a workweek. There is no double time requirement at any threshold. The FLSA permits a subminimum wage of $2.13 per hour for tipped workers (the federal tipped minimum wage has not changed since 1991). Workers with disabilities may be paid below the federal minimum under a separate subminimum wage certificate program (14(c) certificates). A 2024 DOL rule updating overtime salary thresholds was vacated by a Texas federal court in November 2024, reverting thresholds to the 2019 levels of $684 per week for the exemption threshold.

The conflict: Article Thirteen, Section 1 requires regional minimum wage floors at 50% of the BLS regional median hourly wage — replacing the single national number. Section 2 requires double time for hours over 50 in a week. Section 1 eliminates all subminimum wage categories with no exceptions for tipped workers, agricultural workers, or workers with disabilities.

Constitutional authority: Article Thirteen, Sections 1–2 — Regional Minimum Wage; Overtime (implemented in CS-6); Overtime
Action Required Amend the FLSA to: replace 29 U.S.C. §206's single national minimum wage with the two-tier regional minimum wage formula established in CS-6: a state-level floor at 50% of the BLS-measured state median hourly wage (updated every two years), with a metropolitan statistical area override applying when any MSA's median exceeds the state median by more than 20% — in which case the MSA-specific 50% median floor applies to employers in that MSA; add double time requirements for hours over 50 in a single workweek to 29 U.S.C. §207; repeal 29 U.S.C. §203(m)'s tipped minimum wage — all workers receive the full regional minimum; repeal 29 U.S.C. §214(c)'s subminimum wage certificates for workers with disabilities. DOL must publish the initial regional minimum wage calculations within 60 days of the FLSA amendment taking effect.
Amend — Significant
12. National Labor Relations Act
29 U.S.C. §151 et seq. (National Labor Relations Act of 1935, as amended by Taft-Hartley 1947)

Current status: The NLRA protects workers' rights to organize, join unions, and engage in collective bargaining. The Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 amended the NLRA to permit states to pass right-to-work laws (prohibiting union security agreements) and allows employers to permanently replace striking workers under the Mackay Radio doctrine established by the Supreme Court in 1938. The PRO Act, which would have prohibited permanent striker replacement, expanded organizing rights, and limited employer anti-union activities, passed the House in 2021 but died in the Senate. Independent contractor exclusions from the NLRA leave millions of workers without organizing rights under current law.

The conflict: Article Thirteen, Section 4 of the Revised Constitution constitutionalizes organizing rights for all workers regardless of employment classification, prohibits permanent replacement of striking workers, and requires reinstatement of strikers upon conclusion of a strike. Union membership remains voluntary — no worker can be compelled to join or pay dues.

Constitutional authority: Article Thirteen, Section 3 — The Right to Organize; Strike Protections; Voluntary Membership (implemented in CS-6); Strike Protections; Voluntary Membership
Action Required Amend the NLRA to: expand coverage to all workers regardless of employment classification (eliminating independent contractor and supervisory exclusions that deny organizing rights); prohibit permanent replacement of striking workers — temporary replacements may be hired during a strike but must be terminated and strikers reinstated upon conclusion; establish expedited adjudication for employer violations of organizing rights; preserve voluntary union membership — no worker may be compelled to join or pay dues as a condition of employment; and establish meaningful civil and criminal penalties for employer interference with organizing rights.
Amend — Significant
13. Help America Vote Act
52 U.S.C. §20901 et seq. (Help America Vote Act of 2002)

Current status: HAVA established minimum federal election standards, created the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, and provided federal funding for election administration. It requires states to maintain accurate voter rolls and provide provisional ballots. It does not require or provide for free government-issued voter ID. Voter ID requirements are set by each state individually — 35 states require some form of ID; requirements range from strict photo ID to simply signing an affidavit. Over 51% of Americans do not have a valid passport; replacement of certain identity documents can cost over $1,000.

The conflict: Article Three, Section 2 of the Revised Constitution requires a government-issued photo ID to cast a ballot — and equally requires that the government make that ID available to every eligible voter at no cost and without undue burden. The constitutional requirement cannot be imposed without the constitutional guarantee of free access.

Constitutional authority: Article Three, Section 2 — Who Gets to Vote; Free Government ID; Free Government ID
Action Required Amend HAVA to: establish a federal Free Voter ID Program, funded by Congress through the EAC, making a government-issued photo ID available to every eligible voter at no cost; direct every state to provide a free voter ID card at locations accessible without undue burden (including mobile units for rural voters); require that the ID application process accept multiple forms of identity documentation appropriate to different populations; require that state voter ID requirements accept the federally issued free ID; appropriate adequate funding for implementation; and establish the EAC's oversight role in ensuring the program reaches all eligible voters.
Amend — Targeted
14. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act — CFPB Provisions
12 U.S.C. §5491 et seq. (Dodd-Frank Act, Title X — Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)

Current status: Dodd-Frank created the CFPB in 2010. The Supreme Court ruled in Seila Law LLC v. CFPB (2020) that the single-director structure with a "for cause only" removal standard was unconstitutional — the President may remove the CFPB Director at will. The Trump administration in 2025 attempted to gut the CFPB through DOGE directives; federal courts blocked full elimination. The CFPB has returned billions of dollars to consumers harmed by deceptive financial practices. Its current structure leaves it vulnerable to presidential removal at will.

The conflict: Right 39 of the Revised Constitution constitutionalizes the consumer financial protection right and requires Congress to maintain a dedicated enforcement agency whose leadership is removable only for cause — defined as misconduct, incapacity, or willful violation of law, not policy disagreement. Seila Law's holding that at-will removal is required is superseded by the constitutional amendment.

Constitutional authority: Right 39 — The Right to Protection from Financial Predators
Action Required Amend Dodd-Frank Title X to: restore the for-cause-only removal standard for the CFPB Director with the specific constitutional definition of cause (misconduct, incapacity, or willful violation of law); explicitly prohibit presidential removal based on policy disagreement; prohibit defunding the CFPB below the level necessary to fulfill its statutory mandate; establish the agency's constitutional existence as grounded in Article Eight, Right 39, making any attempt to abolish it unconstitutional rather than merely a policy reversal; and preserve the private right of action for consumers harmed by violations of consumer financial protection law.
Amend — Add Protections
15. Fair Housing Act
42 U.S.C. §3601 et seq. (Fair Housing Act of 1968, as amended 1988)

Current status: The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, and financing of housing on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, and disability. Sexual orientation, gender identity, immigration status, and source of income are not protected characteristics under the federal FHA. HUD has closed at least 115 federal fair housing cases without resolution as of May 2025 under the Trump administration's enforcement retreat. Bank regulatory agencies proposed rescinding 2023 Community Reinvestment Act rule revisions in July 2025.

The conflict: Right 32 of the Revised Constitution prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in housing and all other public accommodations. Article Eight, Right 32's equal protection provision provides broader protection than the current FHA.

Constitutional authority: Right 32 — Equal Protection Under the Law, including sexual orientation and gender identity; Right 32 — Equal Protection Generally (implemented in CS-8, CS-14)
Action Required Amend the Fair Housing Act to: add sexual orientation and gender identity as explicitly protected characteristics; add source of income (including housing vouchers) as a protected characteristic; ensure enforcement mechanisms are funded and staffed at levels adequate to process all complaints; direct HUD to reopen and resolve all cases closed without resolution under the 2025 enforcement retreat; and add private right of action improvements to ensure individual consumers can effectively vindicate their housing rights.
Amend — Targeted
16. Social Security Act — Trust Fund and Benefit Floor Provisions
42 U.S.C. §301 et seq. (Social Security Act of 1935, as amended)

Current status: Social Security (OASDI) is funded by dedicated payroll taxes and operates through the Social Security Trust Fund. The Trust Fund is technically off-budget but its surpluses have historically been used to offset the unified budget deficit. Actuarial projections show Trust Fund depletion around 2033-2035 without legislative changes, at which point benefits could be cut by approximately 20-25% unless Congress acts. The Social Security Act is entirely statutory — its benefit levels, retirement age, and payroll tax structure can all be changed by simple majority legislation.

The conflict: Article Seventeen, Section 4 of the Revised Constitution establishes constitutional floors — no benefit cuts below ratification-era levels, no retirement age increases, no reduction in the payroll tax cap. The Trust Fund is constitutionally ring-fenced from the general federal budget. The SSA must be amended to codify these constitutional floors as statutory protections and to formally implement the Trust Fund ring-fencing.

Constitutional authority: Article Seventeen, Section 4 — Social Security: Constitutional Protection Against Cuts
Action Required Amend the Social Security Act to: codify the benefit floor as the level in effect at the time of ratification; prohibit any reduction in benefits, increase in retirement age, or reduction in payroll tax cap below ratification-era levels; formally establish the Social Security Trust Fund as legally separate from and insulated from the general federal budget (no borrowing, raiding, or redirection); and establish the fiscal responsibility mechanism — any expansion of benefits must be accompanied by a funding analysis demonstrating 75-year actuarial solvency within the Social Security financing structure.
Amend — Targeted
17. Lobbying Disclosure Act and Ethics in Government Act
2 U.S.C. §1601 et seq. (Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995); 5 U.S.C. App. §101 et seq. (Ethics in Government Act)

Current status: The LDA requires lobbyists to register and disclose lobbying activity and client relationships. The Ethics in Government Act establishes one-year and two-year cooling-off periods before Members and senior staff may lobby Congress after leaving office. No permanent ban exists. No foreign lobbying lifetime ban exists for senior officials. These cooling-off periods have been routinely circumvented through informal consulting arrangements that technically avoid formal "lobbying" registration.

The conflict: Article Three, Sections 8-9 and Article Ten, Section 3 of the Revised Constitution establish a permanent lifetime lobbying ban for Presidents, Vice Presidents, Members of Congress, Supreme Court Justices, and all their personal staff; a family lobbying ban for the life of the officeholder; and a six-year cooling-off period (up from one or two years) for other senior federal officials, plus a lifetime foreign lobbying ban for all covered officials.

Constitutional authority: Article Three — Congressional Ethics; Article Ten — Anti-Corruption; Article Ten, Section 4 — Revolving Door Closed (implemented in CS-9)
Action Required Amend the LDA to: establish the permanent lifetime lobbying ban for all constitutionally covered persons with criminal penalties for violation; establish the family lobbying ban for the life of the officeholder; extend the cooling-off period for non-covered senior officials from one to two years to six years; establish a lifetime foreign lobbying ban for all covered persons; close the informal consulting loophole by defining "lobbying" broadly to cover all activity that uses former position, relationships, or knowledge to influence federal legislation or regulation; establish mandatory minimum prison sentences and pension forfeiture for violations; and create an independent enforcement office with adequate staff and funding.

Amend — Significant
18. Immigration and Nationality Act
8 U.S.C. §1101 et seq. (INA, 1952, as amended)

Current status: The INA governs admission, removal, detention, and status; much of removal and detention practice runs on limited individualized process and broad executive discretion.

The conflict: Article Seven, Section 3 guarantees immigration due process and Article Twenty-Three imposes enforcement accountability, equal application, limits on mass actions, officer accountability, and work-authorization rules. The INA stays in force but must be amended to conform.

Constitutional authority: Article Seven, Section 3 — Immigration Due Process; Article Twenty-Three — Immigration Enforcement Accountability (implemented by CS-30).
Amend — Add Protections
19. Americans with Disabilities Act
42 U.S.C. §12101 et seq. (ADA, 1990)

Current status: The ADA bars disability discrimination and requires reasonable accommodation, but its coverage, remedies, and accessibility standards fall short of a full constitutional guarantee.

The conflict: Right 43 makes accessibility and accommodation a constitutional right. The ADA remains in force and is strengthened, not replaced.

Constitutional authority: Right 43 — Disability: The Right to Accessibility and Accommodation (implemented by CS-19).
Amend — Significant
20. Communications Decency Act, Section 230
47 U.S.C. §230

Current status: Section 230 broadly immunizes online platforms for third-party content and moderation choices, with no transparency or accountability duties for algorithmic amplification.

The conflict: Article Eighteen, Section 2 imposes platform accountability, and Article Ten, Sections 7–8 require algorithmic transparency and a chronological-feed option. Section 230 must be amended to add these duties.

Constitutional authority: Article Eighteen, Section 2 — Communications Platform Accountability; Article Ten, Sections 7–8. Coupled action: new platform standards supplied by the Media Accountability and Platform Transparency Act (CS-12).
Amend — Significant
21. Federal Arbitration Act
9 U.S.C. §1 et seq. (FAA, 1925)

Current status: The FAA is read to compel enforcement of forced-arbitration and class-waiver clauses in consumer and employment contracts, closing the courthouse door on many everyday disputes.

The conflict: Article Eighteen, Section 7 protects the person in commercial dealings and preserves access to the courts. The FAA must be amended to bar forced pre-dispute arbitration where it strips protected rights.

Constitutional authority: Article Eighteen, Section 7 — Uniform Commercial Law and the Protection of the Person (implemented by CS-34).
Amend — Significant
22. Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts
15 U.S.C. §1 et seq. (Sherman, 1890); 15 U.S.C. §12 et seq. (Clayton, 1914)

Current status: Existing antitrust law turns largely on a consumer-welfare price standard and rarely reaches structural concentration, roll-ups, or private-equity extraction.

The conflict: Article Eighteen establishes a general anti-monopoly principle, a private-equity prohibition, and structural limits. The existing antitrust statutes remain but must be amended to add these standards.

Constitutional authority: Article Eighteen — Protection Against Private Oligarchic Power. Coupled action: works with the Anti-Oligarchy Implementation Act (CS-9), which supplies the new enforcement framework.
Amend — Significant
23. Patent Act and Copyright Act
35 U.S.C. (Patent Act); 17 U.S.C. (Copyright Act)

Current status: Federal patent and copyright law set the scope and duration of exclusive rights and the boundary of the public domain.

The conflict: Article Three, Section 7 directs intellectual-property and public-domain standards that differ from current terms and scope. These titles remain but must be amended to conform.

Constitutional authority: Article Three, Section 7 — Congressional Powers (implemented by CS-32, Intellectual Property and Public Domain Act).
Amend — Targeted
24. Bankruptcy Code
11 U.S.C. (Bankruptcy Code)

Current status: The Code governs debt relief but limits discharge in areas such as student debt and imposes means-testing barriers to a genuine fresh start.

The conflict: Article Three, Section 7 and Article Seven, Section 4 (Criminal Records and Second Chances) support a real fresh start. The Code is amended, not repealed.

Constitutional authority: Article Three, Section 7; Article Seven, Section 4 (implemented by CS-33, Bankruptcy and Fresh Start Act).
Amend — Add Protections
25. Whistleblower Protection Act
5 U.S.C. §2302 (WPA, 1989, as amended)

Current status: Existing whistleblower protections are fragmented across statutes, exclude many workers, and offer weak remedies and slow enforcement.

The conflict: Right 44 and Article Ten, Section 11 mandate comprehensive whistleblower protection. Existing law is consolidated and strengthened.

Constitutional authority: Right 44 — Whistleblower Protection; Article Ten, Section 11 (implemented by CS-28).
Amend — Add Protections
26. Foreign Agents Registration Act
22 U.S.C. §611 et seq. (FARA, 1938)

Current status: FARA requires disclosure by agents of foreign principals but is unevenly enforced and does not reach many foreign-influence channels.

The conflict: Article Twenty-Five, Section 7 protects against foreign-government influence and Article Ten, Section 4 closes foreign-lobbying channels. FARA is strengthened to conform.

Constitutional authority: Article Twenty-Five, Section 7 — Protection Against Foreign Government Influence; Article Ten, Section 4 (implemented by CS-35).
Amend — Add Protections
27. Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act
42 U.S.C. §2000ff et seq. (GINA, 2008)

Current status: GINA bars genetic discrimination in employment and health insurance but leaves gaps in other contexts and in genetic-data privacy.

The conflict: Right 46 establishes genetic privacy and freedom from genetic discrimination broadly. GINA remains and is expanded.

Constitutional authority: Right 46 — Genetic Privacy and Freedom from Genetic Discrimination (implemented by CS-16).
Category Four
New Implementing Legislation Required — Constitutional Mandates Without Existing Statutory Frameworks
These are provisions of the Revised Constitution that create constitutional mandates for which no comparable federal statute currently exists. They do not conflict with existing law — they fill a gap where nothing exists.

The implementing legislation is already drafted. The forty-one Constitutional Statutes (CS-1 through CS-43) that comprise Tier Two of this Constitution are the required implementing legislation. They are enacted by the first post-ratification Congress under the 60% supermajority requirement of Article Three, Section 6, and together they supply the institutional infrastructure every constitutional guarantee depends on. The entries below identify the mandates that had no statutory predecessor and name the Constitutional Statute that now carries each one; they are illustrative of the whole, not a complete inventory of Tier Two.
New Legislation Required
28. Essential Care System Implementation Act
Required by: Article Eleven — Essential Care System; Right 37 — The Right to Healthcare

What must be created: The Revised Constitution mandates an Essential Care system with no comparable existing statute. Congress must pass legislation establishing: the National Healthcare Cost Board (composition, appointment process, subpoena power, independence protections, funding); the national price ceiling framework for all Essential Care services; the insurance utility conversion with an automatic overhead cap phase-in: 25% (Year 1) → 22% (Year 2) → 20% (Year 3) → 18% (Years 4-5) → 15% (Year 6 and permanently) — immutable schedule, advances automatically without further congressional action, may not be paused or reversed except by constitutional amendment; the prior authorization abolition mechanism with federal enforcement; the single national billing system; the national drug price negotiation framework for all Essential Care formulary drugs with the seven-year new drug premium window (at 20% above the international reference price for privately funded drugs; no premium for drugs where 50% or more of R&D costs were federally funded); hospital antitrust enforcement with 30% market share cap; the annual spending target and accountability review process; the public option — a network of State-Federal Public Benefit Corporations (one per state, not-for-profit, governed one-third by enrolled members, one-third by providers, one-third by public appointees; priced at actuarial cost; 15% overhead cap from Day One; Medicare rates plus 15%; available in every county; not a government agency); the dental, vision, and hearing Essential Care basket; Medicare buy-in at age 60 with sliding-scale premiums; and the Strategic Essential Medicines Reserve with triggering conditions, production authority, and suspension mechanism.

Action Required Pass the Essential Care System Implementation Act within one year of ratification. Establish the National Healthcare Cost Board within 180 days. Publish the first Essential Care price ceiling schedule within one year. Launch the public option within two years. The Healthcare Trust Fund must be formally established and ring-fenced from the general budget by implementing statute.
New Legislation Required
29. National Climate Strategy and Science Board Act
Required by: Article Sixteen — Climate, Energy, and Environmental Justice (implemented in CS-7)

What must be created: The Revised Constitution mandates a National Climate Science Board and a National Climate Strategy with no existing statutory equivalent. Congress must pass legislation establishing: the National Climate Science Board (composition of climate scientists and relevant experts, 8-year staggered terms, no energy industry financial interests, independent funding, insulation from political direction); the requirement for Congress to maintain an active National Climate Strategy updated every five years with measurable interim benchmarks; the federal court review mechanism for inadequate strategies (any person has standing, CBO and Science Board findings as evidence); the net-zero federal operations mandate with 180-day planning deadline and 2040 compliance date; the National Environmental Burden Registry (maintained by EPA, all census tracts, all regulated pollutants, updated annually, publicly searchable); and the Environmental Burden Standard permitting framework — no new major polluter in communities above national median burden without proven net pollution reduction.

Action Required Pass the National Climate Strategy and Science Board Act within one year of ratification. Establish the Science Board within 180 days. Publish the first National Climate Strategy within two years. EPA must launch the Environmental Burden Registry within 18 months. Federal agencies must submit net-zero plans within 180 days of ratification.
New Legislation Required
30. National Housing Infrastructure and Broadband Act
Required by: Article Fourteen — Housing: A National Infrastructure Priority

What must be created: The Revised Constitution mandates a National Housing Infrastructure Program and a Universal Broadband Service Program with no comparable existing statutes. Congress must pass legislation establishing: the National Housing Infrastructure Program with funding levels, zoning reform eligibility criteria (eliminate single-family-only zoning, 90-day permitting, remove parking minimums near transit), eligible uses, and annual production reporting; the Federal Home Purchase Savings Match program with the tiered matching structure (3:1, 2:1, 1:1 by income), Home Purchase Savings Account framework, annual federal match appropriation, and primary-residence-only use restriction; the Community Reinvestment Infrastructure Fund with the historical redlined census tract targeting methodology, eligible uses, 30-year minimum authorization, and reauthorization mechanism; and the Universal Broadband Service Program with the minimum speed standard, update mechanism, state voluntary participation framework, ISP common carrier designation process for 40%+ dominant market providers, and FCC enforcement authority.

Action Required Pass the National Housing Infrastructure and Broadband Act within one year of ratification. Publish initial zoning reform eligibility determinations within 180 days. Establish the Home Purchase Savings Account system within one year. FCC must publish initial market dominance determinations for broadband providers within one year.
New Legislation Required
31. Education Investment Act
Required by: Article Fifteen — Education: Investing in the American People

What must be created: The Revised Constitution mandates free community college, a public university tuition cap, a federal teacher pay floor, universal childcare, portable education accounts, and parental rights in education — none of which have existing federal statutory frameworks. Congress must pass legislation establishing: the free community college tuition program with institutional reimbursement formula, funding appropriation, and qualifying student definition (Article Eight, Right 10 qualifying residents); the 10% state median income tuition cap for public four-year institutions with federal gap coverage, income-based sliding scale, and compliance enforcement; the federal Teacher Pay Floor at the BLS regional median wage for bachelor's degree holders with two-year update cycle and state compliance conditions tied to federal education funding; the Universal Childcare Subsidy System with the 7% gross income cap, licensed provider payment mechanism, state administration, federal safety-only standards, no curriculum mandate, working/student parent eligibility, and congressional funding mandate for all eligible families; the Portable Education Account program with account funding formula (80% of per-pupil expenditure), state voluntary administration, anti-discrimination and accreditation eligibility requirements, public school 20% retention, organizing rights requirements for non-ministerial staff, and fraud prevention mechanisms; and the parental rights framework with curriculum transparency portal requirements, opt-out process, limits (no opt-out from core factual science/history/civics), and anti-retaliation protections.

Action Required Pass the Education Investment Act within two years of ratification. DOL must publish initial Teacher Pay Floor calculations within 90 days of enactment. States must have two years to implement the tuition cap and childcare subsidy systems. The PEA program may be phased in over three years.
New Legislation Required
32. National Referendum Administration — Incorporated into CS-5
Required by: Article Eight, Section 1 — The National Referendum

What must be created: The Revised Constitution establishes a national referendum mechanism with no existing institutional infrastructure. Congress must pass legislation establishing: the Office of the National Referendum — organizational structure, funding, and staffing; the petition verification system — how the 10% signature threshold from 30 states is collected, verified, and certified; the ballot process — timelines, ballot language standards, voting procedures (using the existing federal election infrastructure), and certification; the congressional response mechanism — how Congress receives a certified referendum result, timelines for legislation and amendment votes, and public hearing requirements; and anti-fraud and anti-foreign-influence provisions.

Action Required Pass the National Referendum Administration — Incorporated into CS-5 within one year of ratification. The Office must be operational before the first federal election cycle following ratification.
New Legislation Required
33. Federal Data Privacy Act
Required by: Right 38 — The Right to Control Your Personal Information

ENACTED — CS-16 (Federal Data Privacy Act). This item has been fully addressed. CS-16 establishes: definitions of personal information, sensitive data categories, and explicit informed consent (specific, affirmative, for each use — not a buried checkbox); individual rights of access, correction, deletion, portability, and withdrawal; data minimization obligations; data broker registration with annual FTC disclosure; opt-in consent for sensitive data categories (health, biometric, location, children's data); FTC civil penalties up to $100,000/violation for sensitive data violations; private right of action with $1,000–$5,000 statutory damages per violation without proof of actual harm; state AG concurrent enforcement; and floor preemption allowing states to exceed but not fall below federal standards. All elements of this item have been implemented.

Action Required No further action required. CS-16 (Federal Data Privacy Act) is enacted and addresses all requirements of this item.
New Legislation Required
34. National Historical Injustice Commission Act
Required by: Article Seventeen, Section 1 — The National Historical Injustice Commission [ENACTED — CS-17]

What must be created: The Revised Constitution establishes a 15-member independent commission with subpoena power and a five-year mandate to produce a factual economic accounting of the legacy of slavery and government-sanctioned racial injustice. Congress must pass legislation establishing: the commission's membership criteria and joint appointment process (President, Senate President pro tempore, Speaker of the House); the commission's subpoena authority and enforcement mechanism; its budget and protection from defunding before delivery of the final report; the five-year fixed term and reporting requirements; the congressional response obligation — hearings within six months of the report, legislation brought to a recorded vote within two years; and the commission's dissolution process upon delivery of the final report.

Action Required No further action required. CS-17 (National Historical Injustice Commission Act) is enacted. The commission must be constituted within 180 days of ratification, with a five-year mandate to produce a factual economic accounting of the legacy of slavery and government-sanctioned racial injustice. The commission does not make policy recommendations. Congressional hearings within six months of the final report and a recorded vote on legislation within two years are mandatory under CS-17.
New Legislation Required
35. Judicial Ethics Commission Act
Required by: Article Three, Section 3; Article Five, Section 3 — Judicial Ethics and Accountability

What must be created: The Revised Constitution establishes an independent Judicial Ethics Commission with binding authority over all federal judges including Supreme Court Justices — no such body currently exists. Congress must pass legislation establishing: the commission's composition — four members from each major party, ninth member by unanimous agreement or lot from retired federal appellate judges who have been off the bench at least five years; the appointment process for each of the eight partisan members; the ninth member selection mechanism including the 60-day unanimity window and the lot procedure; staggered 6-year terms with cause-only removal by two-thirds of the full commission; the binding ethics code covering gifts, travel, financial conflicts, and recusal standards; the investigation and adjudication process; the penalties available — including referral for impeachment for Supreme Court Justices; the commission's budget and protection from political defunding; and the mandatory recusal mechanism for judges with direct financial stakes.

Action Required Pass the Judicial Ethics Commission Act within one year of ratification. The commission must be constituted within 180 days. The binding ethics code must be published within one year of the commission's constitution.
New Legislation Required
36. Anti-Oligarchy Implementation Act
Required by: Article Eighteen — Protection Against Private Oligarchic Power (implemented in CS-9 and CS-12)

What must be created: Article Eighteen establishes three constitutional mandates — the general anti-monopoly principle, the communications platform accountability framework, and the regulatory capture prohibition — none of which have complete existing statutory frameworks. Article Ten, Section 6 has been updated with two new media concentration provisions. Congress must pass legislation establishing: the FTC's constitutional authority to declare markets essential and subject to democratic accountability under Article Eighteen, Section 1; structural antitrust remedies including divestiture, functional separation, and access requirements for dominant essential market actors; the threshold determination process for Article Eighteen, Section 2 platform designation (10% of adult population as primary political news source); the methodology for measuring aggregate cross-platform reach under Article Ten, Section 6's cross-platform aggregate concentration cap — specifically how the FTC calculates unduplicated combined audience across television, radio, print, digital news, social media, search engines, podcasting, and film distribution annually; the enforcement mechanism and mandatory divestiture remedies for violations of the 40% aggregate cap; the cross-ownership prohibition enforcement framework — defining the six media categories, the 10% individual platform reach threshold, the 18-month mandatory divestiture timeline, and the personal liability structure for individual owners who fail to divest; the Digital Communications Accountability Board — composition, appointment process, jurisdiction, complaint process, investigation authority, and penalty structure covering nondiscrimination, owner non-interference, and cross-ownership requirements; the specific nondiscrimination and owner non-interference enforcement mechanisms including personal liability for individual platform owners; the pre-service and post-service restriction enforcement mechanisms for Article Eighteen, Section 3 — including the Office of Government Ethics registry, the void appointment mechanism, the federal felony penalties, and forfeiture procedures; and the coordination between Article Eighteen, Article Ten Section 6, and existing antitrust, telecommunications, and ethics statutes. Congress must also identify and review all existing FCC media ownership rules for consistency with the new constitutional framework — existing rules that fall below the constitutional floors must be raised; rules that conflict must be replaced.

Action Required Pass the Anti-Oligarchy Implementation Act within two years of ratification. The FTC must publish initial essential market designations within one year and the first annual aggregate cross-platform reach measurement within one year. The Digital Communications Accountability Board must be constituted within 180 days of the Act's enactment. The Office of Government Ethics must publish the initial Article Eighteen, Section 3 registry within 90 days of enactment. Any individual or entity found to be in violation of the cross-ownership prohibition upon the Act's enactment has 18 months from that date to achieve compliance through divestiture. Congress must update all existing antitrust and telecommunications statutes to incorporate both the constitutional anti-monopoly principle and the new cross-platform concentration framework as the explicit statutory basis for FTC, DOJ Antitrust Division, and FCC enforcement authority.
New Legislation Required — By Year Four
37. Federal Elections Tabulation Standards Act
Required by: Article Nine, Section 4 — Ranked-Choice Voting in General Elections

What must be created: Article Eleven, Section 4 mandates ranked-choice voting for all federal general elections and requires it to be operational within two federal election cycles of ratification. The ranked-choice requirement is grounded in Congress's Article One, Section 4 plenary authority over the manner of holding federal elections — it is a federal ballot-counting standard for federal offices, not a commandeering of state electoral administration. Congress must pass legislation establishing: the uniform ranked-choice tabulation algorithm and counting procedure to be used for all federal general elections — specifying how ballots are counted, how candidates are eliminated, how redistributed ballots are processed, and how winners are certified; a federally developed, open-source tabulation software system made available at no cost to every state for use in counting federal ballots; a federal implementation fund providing grants to states, counties, and local election jurisdictions to cover the costs of implementing ranked-choice counting for federal offices; voter education resources explaining ranked-choice voting, to be distributed by the federal government in every federal election jurisdiction; uniform ballot design standards for ranked-choice federal ballots that are consistent with accessibility requirements; a certification process for ranked-choice results at the state level before transmission to the relevant federal authority; and a clear statement that states are not required to use ranked-choice voting for their own state and local elections — the federal requirement applies exclusively to the tabulation of votes for federal offices (President, Senate, and House of Representatives). Congress must also amend the Help America Vote Act to incorporate ranked-choice tabulation standards and funding mechanisms within this implementing framework.

Action Required Pass the Federal Elections Tabulation Standards Act within two years of ratification. The federal tabulation software must be certified and available to all states within three years of ratification. Ranked-choice counting must be fully operational for all federal general elections by the second federal general election following ratification — approximately four years after ratification. States must receive all federal software, funding, and training support necessary for implementation no later than six months before the first federal general election in which ranked-choice counting will apply.

New Legislation Required
38. AI Governance and Algorithmic Rights Act
No existing comprehensive federal framework

Current status: No general federal statute governs algorithmic decision-making, AI transparency, AI in criminal justice, autonomous weapons, or AI concentration of power.

The conflict: Article Twenty-Two requires a comprehensive AI-governance framework. This is entirely new legislation with nothing to repeal or amend.

Constitutional authority: Article Twenty-Two — Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Governance (implemented by CS-20). New framework; runs on the constitutional implementation deadline.
New Legislation Required
39. Mental-Health Detention Due Process Act
No existing comprehensive federal framework

Current status: Involuntary civil commitment runs on a patchwork of state standards with uneven evidentiary, clinical, and judicial safeguards; there is no uniform federal floor.

The conflict: Article Twenty-Eight and Right 51 require real evidence, a prompt independent clinician, a prompt neutral judge, the least-restrictive means, and a bar on commitment as a tool of control.

Constitutional authority: Article Twenty-Eight — Protection Against Arbitrary Mental-Health Detention; Right 51 (implemented by CS-38). New framework; on deadline.
New Legislation Required
40. Energy Security and Self-Generation Act
No existing comprehensive federal framework

Current status: No federal statute guarantees a right to generate your own power, bars life-threatening disconnection, or sets an affordability-and-reliability floor across the grid.

The conflict: Article Twenty-Six and Right 53 establish energy security, the right to self-generate, and protection from dangerous disconnection.

Constitutional authority: Article Twenty-Six — Energy Security and Self-Generation; Right 53 (implemented by CS-41). New framework; on deadline.
New Legislation Required
41. Militia, National Guard, and Anti-Paramilitary Act
No existing comprehensive federal framework

Current status: Existing militia and Guard authority is scattered and, with the Insurrection Act, permits domestic military use; there is no clean statutory line against private paramilitaries.

The conflict: Article Twenty-Five, Section 8 defines the National Guard and militia under civil authority and prohibits private armies.

Constitutional authority: Article Twenty-Five, Section 8 (implemented by CS-37). Coupled action: the legitimate framework that must exist alongside repeal of the Insurrection Act (Category One).
New Legislation Required
42. Children’s Rights Implementation Act
Amends 29 U.S.C. §203 (FLSA child-labor provisions); otherwise new framework

Current status: Federal law addresses child labor narrowly and permits juvenile life-without-parole in some contexts; there is no unified children’s-rights framework.

The conflict: Article Twenty-One establishes the best interests of the child, family-unity protections, a bar on juvenile life without parole, protection from commercial exploitation, and child-labor limits.

Constitutional authority: Article Twenty-One — Children’s Rights. New framework with a targeted FLSA child-labor amendment; on deadline.
New Legislation Required
43. Tribal Nations Trust and Self-Governance Act
Affirms and consolidates existing Indian law; new comprehensive framework

Current status: Federal Indian law is a fragmented body of treaties, statutes, and doctrine, with recurring disputes over the scope of the trust responsibility and funding.

The conflict: Article Twenty affirms inherent sovereignty, treaties as supreme law, the federal trust responsibility, self-governance, and funding parity.

Constitutional authority: Article Twenty — Tribal Nations and the Trust Relationship. New consolidating framework; on deadline.
New Legislation Required
44. Historical Injustice Remedy Act (Reparative Obligation)
No existing comprehensive federal framework

Current status: There is no standing federal framework for remedying documented historical injustice as an obligation rather than a discretionary program.

The conflict: Article Seven, Section 5 establishes the obligation to remedy documented historical injustice, working with the National Historical Injustice Commission (Article Seventeen, Section 1).

Constitutional authority: Article Seven, Section 5 — Reparations. Coupled action: paired with the National Historical Injustice Commission Act (CS-17). New framework; on deadline.
New Legislation Required
45. Washington, Douglass Commonwealth Admission Act
No existing enacted framework (prior bills introduced, none enacted)

Current status: The District of Columbia has no voting representation in Congress and is not a state; admission requires an act of Congress.

The conflict: Article Seventeen, Section 7 provides for admission of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth.

Constitutional authority: Article Seventeen, Section 7 — Washington, Douglass Commonwealth. New framework; on deadline.
Constitutional Statutes — All 41 Enacted
Tier Two Implementation: Complete
All 43 Constitutional Statutes implementing this Constitution have been enacted by the first post-ratification Congress under the 60% supermajority requirement. All items in this Transition Act have been addressed. No constitutional mandate identified in this resolution remains unimplemented.
All Legislative Gaps Closed: Items 21 (Federal Data Privacy Act) and 22 (National Historical Injustice Commission Act), previously identified as genuine remaining legislative gaps, have both been enacted as CS-16 and CS-17 respectively. The two-item gap identified in the final legal review has been fully closed.
TA ItemSubjectEnacted As
Items 1-4 (Cat. 1)Marijuana, Death Penalty, Debt Ceiling, FECASelf-executing (Cat. 1) + CS-1, CS-5
Items 5-8 (Cat. 2)OBBBA Healthcare, CRA, VRA Preclearance, STOCK ActCS-3, CS-1, CS-15, CS-1
Items 9-15 (Cat. 3)FLSA, NLRA, HAVA, Dodd-Frank, Fair Housing, SSA, LobbyingCS-6, CS-6, CS-1, CS-9, CS-14, CS-15, CS-1/CS-9
Items 16-17 (Cat. 4)Essential Care System, Climate StrategyCS-3, CS-7
Items 18-20 (Cat. 4)Housing/Broadband, Education, National ReferendumCS-14, CS-8, CS-5
Item 21 (Cat. 4)Federal Data Privacy ActCS-16 — Federal Data Privacy Act ✓
Item 22 (Cat. 4)National Historical Injustice CommissionCS-17 — National Historical Injustice Commission Act ✓
Items 23-25 (Cat. 4)Judicial Ethics, Anti-Oligarchy/Media, ElectionsCS-2, CS-9/CS-12, CS-10
Category Five — Added After Initial Passage
Ten Newly Codified Constitutional Doctrines — State Conformity Required
After this Act's initial passage, ten previously case-law-only constitutional doctrines were codified directly into the Constitution's text. These new provisions are self-executing upon ratification. The following identifies existing state laws that must be brought into conformity with each newly codified doctrine. Brady and Miranda conformity are highest priority; travel restriction statutes void immediately upon ratification.
Codified DoctrineConstitutional LocationState Law Conformity RequiredDeadline
Actual Malice StandardRight 4, §2State defamation laws imposing liability on public figures without actual malice; state anti-SLAPP laws that don't include mandatory fee-shifting2 years
Exclusionary Rule (three-year pattern)Right 9, §2State evidence codes recognizing broader good-faith exceptions; state doctrines following Leon without the three-year pattern limit now unconstitutional2 years
Miranda — Any Indication Stops QuestioningRight 13, §2State criminal procedure rules applying Berghuis v. Thompkins "unambiguous invocation" requirement now unconstitutional; state interrogation training must be revised1 year
Brady — All Government AgenciesRight 14, §2State discovery rules limiting Brady to prosecutor's personal knowledge rather than all agencies in the investigation; state post-conviction relief procedures must accommodate the "useful to the defense" standard1 year
Equal Protection Tiers (government bears burden)Right 32, §2State laws classifying on sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity now face intermediate scrutiny with government bearing the burden; laws that relied on rational basis for these categories require review2 years
Total IncorporationArt. 1, §6Confirms all prior piecemeal incorporation. No specific repeal required. State courts applying Barron v. Baltimore analysis must apply Article One §6 instead. Private entities with governmental contracts or practical monopolies over public functions are now constitutionally bound.Self-executing
Right to Travel — No Travel PenaltiesArt. 6, §5All state laws penalizing residents for traveling to other states are void upon ratification. Post-Dobbs travel restriction statutes, including laws attempting to criminalize travel for healthcare, are immediately unconstitutional and unenforceable.Immediate
One Person One VoteArt. 6, §6State legislative apportionment laws must comply with population equality standards. CS-11 provides the federal enforcement mechanism. State courts may apply Art. 6 §6 directly in state redistricting litigation.2 years
Youngstown/Executive PrivilegeArt. 4, §§9-10These provisions govern federal executive authority only. No state law conformity required.N/A
Resolution
Congressional Commitment and Enforcement

Be it resolved that the Congress of the United States, in anticipation of the ratification of the Revised Constitution of the United States, hereby commits to the legislative agenda set forth in this resolution and to the timelines specified herein.

Congress shall begin drafting all implementing legislation identified in this resolution during the ratification period, so that such legislation is ready for introduction and passage immediately upon the Constitution taking effect. No constitutional right or mandate shall be left unimplemented due to congressional inaction, delay, or the use of the appropriations process to gut constitutionally required programs.

Any Member of Congress who fails to bring required implementing legislation to a recorded vote within the timelines specified in this resolution shall be publicly identified in a report published by the Government Accountability Office and transmitted to every constituent in their district or state. The GAO shall publish this report annually from the date of ratification until all required legislation has been enacted.

This resolution is a statement of congressional intent, not itself a law. The specific repeal, amendment, and new legislation described in each entry shall be accomplished through separate bills introduced, debated, and passed in accordance with the legislative process established by the Revised Constitution — beginning in the House of Representatives, confirmed by the Senate, and signed by the President or passed over a veto by two-thirds of both chambers.

Constitutional Transition and Legal Conformity Act — 120th Congress — Pre-Ratification Resolution
Identifying 25 federal statutes and legislative items requiring repeal, amendment, or replacement upon ratification of the Revised Constitution of the United States
Category One: 4 immediate repeals  |  Category Two: 4 within one year  |  Category Three: 7 amendments within two years  |  Category Four: 11 new implementing statutes — all 43 Constitutional Statutes enacted  |  Status: All gaps closed